![]() |
|
|
1932—1935 PHOTOS |
"THE LITTLE COLONEL," 1935 |
| NY TIMES REVIEW BY ANDRE SENNWALD, MARCH 22, 1935: The Shirley Temple situation is rapidly getting out of hand. Several months ago, in "Bright Eyes," David Butler propelled the national idol through a sentimental circus which, uninhibited by this column's failure to be amused, proceeded to earn incredible profits on six continents. Now Mr. Butler has blended his directorial gifts with Buddy DeSylva's in the composition of "Little Colonel," which promises to be equally contemptuous of the power of the press. All adrip with magnolia whimsy and vast, unashamed portions of synthetic Dixie atmosphere, it allows Mistress Temple to patter merrily through her distinguished répertoire, presents Colonel Lionel Barrymore in a white goatee and suspiciously bushy eyebrows, and, as though that weren't enough to insure a million dollar gross, tosses Bill Robinson, the heel-and-toe wizard, into the brew. "The Little Colonel," in the opinion of this old fussbudget, is so ruthless in its exploitation of Miss Temple's great talent for infant charm that it seldom succeeds in being properly lively and gay. But the little girl continues to be delightfully unspoiled, if that is what you want to know, and the Music Hall's clientele indicated that it was being vastly entertained. The film is located in the deep South at some vague period in the post-Civil War years, and its people, perhaps out of a desire to avoid offense, go to great pains not to sound authentic in their speech. Colonel Barrymore, it appears, has disowned his daughter, Evelyn Venable, for marrying a damned Yankee, interpreted by John Lodge Little Miss Temple is Heaven's gift to the young couple and most of the choice bits in "The Little Colonel" describe the infant's campaign to penetrate the old gentleman's iron exterior and discover the warm heart underneath. Then there are a pair of bad men who try to rob Shirley's paw of the deed to the land through which the railroad is anxious to run. Perhaps it is giving away a secret to report that Shirley summons the Colonel and his horse pistol in time to let the customers in the second mezzanine recover their composure. To the already extensive gifts of the pint-size Duse, we may now add talent for tap-dancing. When Mr. Robinson, the Colonel's faithful man, struts through one of his agile staircase routines while he is conducting the precocious tot to bed, she falls right into the spirit of the thing and insists on making it a duet. In addition she sings a nostalgic ditty which causes Colonel Barrymore to weep briefly into his mustache, and adds to his confusion by wearing a bustle and pantalettes in a manner for which, unfortunately, the only accurate word is cute. Yesterday's audience applauded "The Little Colonel" for eleven seconds after Miss Temple faded out in Mr. Barrymore's arms. It seems to be right up to the standard of "Bright Eyes" and ought to bring out the best in every one who sees it. |
![]() |
![]() With Lionel Barrymore |
![]() With Lionel Barrymore |
![]() With Lionel Barrymore |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() With Bill Robinson |
![]() |
"CURLY TOP," 1935 |
| NY TIMES REVIEW BY ANDRE SENNWALD, AUGUST 2, 1935: Shirley Temple's new picture is dedicated to the simple things of life, with special reference to the power of the hello-neighbor smile in conquering the ills of humanity. So shameless is it in its optimism, so grimly determined to be cheerful, that it ought to cause an epidemic of axe murders and grandmother beatings in this sober vicinity. Shirley herself, far from showing signs of deterioration or overwork in "Curly Top," actually hints in her work at an increased maturity of technique. Her remarkable sense of timing has never been revealed more plainly than in the song and dance scenes in her new film, and she plays her straightforward dramatic scenes with the assurance and precision of a veteran actress. With all this, she has lost none of her native freshness and charm. |
![]() With John Boles & Arthur Treacher |
![]() With John Boles |
![]() |
![]() Curly Top, 1935 |
![]() Curly Top, 1935 |
![]() Curly Top, 1935 |
![]() Curly Top, 1935 |
![]() Curly Top, 1935 |
![]() With Rochelle Hudson |
1935 PHOTOS |
"POOR LITTLE RICH GIRL," 1936 |
| NY TIMES REVIEW BY FRANK S. NUGENT, JUNE 26, 1936: Shirley Temple, the mighty moppet, continues to be the Sandow of the Cinema by pirouetting gracefully at the Radio City Music Hall under the weight of a formless and generally ridiculous script. As a picture, "The Poor Little Rich Girl" is virtually non-existent; as a display window for the ever-expanding Temple talents, it is entirely satisfying. Miss Temple, as some one has said, never looked lovelier. She dances in a manner which must delight her mentor, Bill Robinson; her voice has begun to take on torch-singer and crooner qualities. Beneath the fascinated gaze of a world-wide audience, a conscious artistry is developing—along Hollywood and Broadway lines. It is an engrossing phenomenon: The precocious infant becomes a knowing child. |
1936–1937 PHOTOS |
“HEIDI,” 1937 |
1937—1938 |
“THE LITTLE PRINCESS,” 1939 |
![]() On the way to the set |
![]() |
![]() With Ian Hunter and Mary Nash |
![]() |
![]() With Mary Nash |
![]() With Richard Greene |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
“THE BLUE BIRD,” 1940 |
| NY TIMES REVIEW BY FRANK S. NUGENT, JAN. 20, 1940: Fantasy either trips or trudges, and "The Blue Bird," which had its première at the Hollywood last night, is generally a case of the movies slogging over Maeterlinck. It is an abridged edition Twentieth Century-Fox is presenting; brilliantly Technicolored, scaled to the dimensions of a World of Tomorrow and replete with Shirley Temple. As a children's show we suppose it is quite acceptable. At least it is edifyingly moral and moralistic and not too frightening in its graveyard scenes or forest fire. But it has about the gayety and sparkle of the first half of "A Christmas Carol" and, in the case of Eddie Collins's Tylo, the delicacy of humor that made the Minsky shows famous. It may interest Maeterlinck to hear that Tylo, the dog, remarks during the forest scene, "This is the first time a tree ever turned on me." And that, upon being ordered to the kennels by Mr. and Mrs. Luxury (a pair of ringers in his fairy play), he offers this nifty: "I might have known I'd wind up in the dog-house." We have no objection, mark, to an adapter's attempt to brighten Maeterlinck's style a bit: the fact is we've long considered "The Blue Bird" complete twaddle which might have done for a generation that matured in time to devour Harold Bell Wright, Ouida and the Baroness Orczy, but was far too childish for ours. (And if that be treason, it's high time for it.) But we resent brightening by means of a muddy brush. Burlesque's Mr. Collins, with his burlesque speech and mannerisms, was clearly in the wrong film. At any rate, we found ourselves sitting back stoically and even with Spartan resignation as (Mytyl (Mistress Temple) and Tyltyl (round little Johnny Russell) went from their beds in the woodchopper's hut, accompanied by Light, by Tylo and by Tylette the Cat, to look for the Blue Bird of Happiness. Maeterlinck had outlined several ports of call, but Ernest Pascal who rewrote him, only had the children take in the Past, where they met Granny and Gaffer Tyl, who were not really dead, just waiting for some one to think of them; the home of the Luxurys (an improvisation), where they learned that happiness was not in riches; and—after the forest fire interlude—the Future, where all the unborn children of the world were waiting for Father Time to call for them and take them to earth in his golden ship with silver sails. Finally, of course, they discover the Blue Bird right in their own home. It is our notion there was nothing winged about the fantasy to begin with and it has become even more earthbound in the manner of its screen translation. If children are to represent the children, then it seems incongruous to turn the Dog and the Cat into grown-up Mr. Collins and sheath-gowned Gale Sondergaard, who are a bit large to be playing games. Helen Ericson's Light fits the role merely by being lightly clad (and solidly pink beneath the tulle) and there is no sign of Bread, Fire, Milk and Water whom Maeterlinck also had sent on the quest. The sets are large and provide an attractive technicolor background, but scarcely make for a dreamlike effect, being all too obviously fabricated of paint and plaster and papier-mâché. In only one sequence has the camera joined hands with fantasy and that is the forest fire, which is splendid. Had the rest of the film its quality, Mr. Disney's hold on the crown of fantasy might have been endangered. But, as it runs, "The Blue Bird" takes its place with "Alice in Wonderland" and "The Wizard of Oz" in demonstrating that fancy can be free on the screen only when it is not asked to contend with the weight and density of human bodies and physical things. Inevitably they trip it as it tries to trip. |
1940’s |
“KATHLEEN” & SHIRLEY AT MGM, 1941 |
| NY TIMES REVIEW BY T.S., DEC. 19, 1941: Having left the Twentieth Century-Fox lot nearly two years ago, Shirley Temple at the ripe age of twelve is making a "comeback" in "Kathleen" at the Capitol. And crack out of the box we can tell you that MGM, her new sponsors, haven't done right by our Shirley. Out of her indubitable charm they have created a vexatious, pucker-faced little brat full of sugary day dreams to make an audience wince. They have confronted her proven talents as an actress with stilted situations that even a Duse couldn't carry off. Assigned to a vehicle for Mistress Temple, the script writer seems to have become all thumbs. The scenario either talks down to the young lady or fills her mouth with precocious baby-talk, which is worse. |
1940’s, Pt. 2 |
"SINCE YOU WENT AWAY," 1944 |
| NY TIMES REVIEW BY BOSLEY CROWTHER, JULY 21, 1944: In his first screen production in four years—his first since "Rebecca" and "Gone With the Wind"—David O Selznick has surrendered again to his hankering for size and has turned out another massive picture in "Since You Went Away." For two hours and fifty-one minutes this new film at the Capitol delves with a warm and gracious sympathy into the heart of what it terms "the American home" and yearns with a mother and her daughters whose best-loved men go dutifully to war. Although it makes several passes at observing surface phases of home-front life, its chief concern is three females and their immediate circle of friends. Its humors are frequent and cheerful; its spirit is hopeful and brave. But it does come off, altogether, as a rather large dose of choking sentiment. |
1940’s, Pt. 3 |
WEDDING TO JOHN AGAR, SEPT. 19, 1945 |
“THE BACHELOR AND THE BOBBY-SOXER,” 1947 |
| NY TIMES REVIEW BY BOSLEY CROWTHER., JULY 27, 1947: We wouldn't be able to tell you whether Sidney Sheldon, the fellow who wrote "The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer," which came to the Music Hall yesterday, has suffered personal harassment at the hands of modern youth. But whether he has or hasn't, he certainly understands that dreadful fate. And, furthermore, he knows how to make it seem delightfully bewildering on the screen—which may not be wholly consistent but which makes for most agreeable film fare. |
1940’s, Pt. 3 |
1950’s—1980’s |
^RETURN TO TOP |